全儲備銀行業務

全儲備銀行業務也被稱為百分之百儲備銀行業務，相對於「部分儲備銀行業務」，這類銀行需要具備相對應儲戶所存入的現金的所有額度，讓存款者在提款時滿足他們的需求。舉例來說，顧客們的活期存款帳戶或是支票戶口這類的存款都不能被銀行作為借貸的流動資金，因為這些資金是銀行顧客們需要資金時要立即滿足他們需求的金額。相對應的，定期存款則沒有這方面的要求與限制，在定期存款期間，銀行可以不用立即履行顧客們的金錢需求^[1]。

在過去的貨幣改革，充分儲備銀行業務被許多經濟學家廣泛提出，特別是在1935年有一群經濟學家，其中包括歐文·費雪，這些思維主要是對於大蕭條做出回應^[2]^[3]。然而在現今的世界中，沒有任何金融體系特別提到全儲備銀行業務，主要是由於銀行業藉由合約來滿足存款準備金比率。

全儲備銀行業務的觀點

經濟學家米爾頓·佛利民認為支票帳戶需要具有百分之百的儲備要求^[4] ，另外勞倫斯·克里寇夫也呼籲應該終結部分準備金銀行業務^[5]。奧地利經濟學派的經濟學家穆瑞·羅斯巴德也曾撰文指出不能符合全儲備銀行業務的銀行都是非法的，另外全儲備銀行業務可以減少擠兌的風險^[6]^[7]。

一些經濟學家指出，由於銀行不能使用活期存款來供人貸款，因此難以從活期存款賺取的收益，認為儲戶必須支付與活期存款賬戶相關聯服務的費用。雖然多數人都瞭解到這方面的狀況，不過大眾可能會拒絕這項政策^[8]^[9]。隨著央行零利率和負利率政策，一些儲戶已經開始把把自己的積蓄存入需要支付存款費用的地方甚至存入部分儲備銀行業務^[10]。經濟學家道格拉斯·戴蒙德與菲利浦H. 迪維格也警告在全儲備銀行業務下，銀行不能使用這部分的資金作借貸，會造成活期存款功能被不受監管的機構諸如垃圾債券所取代，進而造成垃圾債券成為金融中介與期限轉換，使金融體系的不穩定並造成金融危機的風險增加^[11]^[12]。

對於2007年–2008年環球金融危機的反思，金融時報首席經濟學家馬丁·沃爾夫贊同全儲備銀行業務，並說到"這將帶來巨大的好處"^[3]，約翰·H·科克倫（英語：John_H._Cochrane）也認同全儲備銀行業務的優勢^[13]。然而保羅·克魯格曼在紐約時報的回應則是認為"全儲備銀行業務當然值得談論"，但擔心它會推動銀行體系之外的金融活動，強化了影子銀行這類較少受到規範的金融體系所^[14]。

參見

參考文獻

^ A Program for Monetary Reform
^ Fisher, Irving, 100% Money, 1935
^ ^3.0 ^3.1 Weisenthal, Joe. BAN ALL THE BANKS: Here's The Wild Idea That People Are Starting To Take Seriously. Business Insider. [2016-07-02]. （原始內容存檔於2020-11-01）.
^ Solow, Robert M., On the Lender of Last Resort, Financial crises, contagion, and the lender of last resort, Oxford University Press: 203, March 28, 2002 [2016-07-02], ISBN 978-0-19-924721-9, （原始內容存檔於2019-07-26）
^ Kotlikoff, Laurence J.; Leamer, Edward, A Banking System We Can Trust (PDF), Forbes.com, April 23, 2009 [September 14, 2010], （原始內容 (PDF)存檔於2011年6月4日）
^ Rothbard, Murray N., The Mystery of Banking (PDF), Ludwig von Mises Institute, [September 14, 2010], ISBN 978-1-933550-28-2, （原始內容存檔 (PDF)於2014-11-11）
^ The Case for a 100% Gold Dollar （頁面存檔備份，存於網際網路檔案館）, Murray Rothbard
^ White, Lawrence H. Accounting for Fractional-Reserve Banknotes and Deposits—or, What’s Twenty Quid to the Bloody Midland Bank? (PDF). The Independent Review. Winter 2003, 7 (3): 423–41 [2016-07-02]. ISSN 1086-1653. （原始內容 (PDF)存檔於2015-04-29）.
^ Allen, William. Irving Fisher and the 100 Percent Reserve Proposal. Journal of Law and Economics. October 1993, 36 (2): 703–17. JSTOR 725805. doi:10.1086/467295.
^ Texan Gold Depository. [2016-07-02]. （原始內容存檔於2017-10-26）.
^ Diamond, Douglas W; Philip H. Dybvig, Banking Theory, Deposit Insurance, and Bank Regulation, The Journal of Business, Jan 1986, 59 (1): 55–68, JSTOR 2352687, doi:10.1086/296314, In conclusion, 100% reserve banking is a dangerous proposal that would do substantial damage to the economy by reducing the overall amount of liquidity. Furthermore, the proposal is likely to be ineffective in increasing stability since it will be impossible to control the institutions that will enter in the vacuum left when banks can no longer create liquidity. Fortunately, the political realities make it unlikely that this radical and imprudent proposal will be adopted. |quote=和|postscript=只需其一 (幫助)
^ Diamond, Douglas; Philip Dybvig. Bank Runs, Deposit Insurance, and Liquidity (PDF). Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review. Winter 2000, 24 (1): 14–23 [29 August 2012]. （原始內容存檔 (PDF)於2012-08-29）.
^ Cochrane, John. Toward a run - free financial system (PDF). [2016-07-02]. （原始內容存檔 (PDF)於2014-04-29）.
^ Krugman, Paul. Is A Banking Ban The Answer?. New York Times. April 26, 2014 [September 18, 2015]. （原始內容存檔於2019-12-08）.

[1] A Program for Monetary Reform

[2] Fisher, Irving, 100% Money, 1935

[Weisenthal-3] 3.0 ^3.1 Weisenthal, Joe. BAN ALL THE BANKS: Here's The Wild Idea That People Are Starting To Take Seriously. Business Insider. [2016-07-02]. （原始內容存檔於2020-11-01）.

[4] Solow, Robert M., On the Lender of Last Resort, Financial crises, contagion, and the lender of last resort, Oxford University Press: 203, March 28, 2002 [2016-07-02], ISBN 978-0-19-924721-9, （原始內容存檔於2019-07-26）

[5] Kotlikoff, Laurence J.; Leamer, Edward, A Banking System We Can Trust (PDF), Forbes.com, April 23, 2009 [September 14, 2010], （原始內容 (PDF)存檔於2011年6月4日）

[6] Rothbard, Murray N., The Mystery of Banking (PDF), Ludwig von Mises Institute, [September 14, 2010], ISBN 978-1-933550-28-2, （原始內容存檔 (PDF)於2014-11-11）

[The_Case_for_a_100%_Gold_Dollar-7] The Case for a 100% Gold Dollar （頁面存檔備份，存於網際網路檔案館）, Murray Rothbard

[White2003-8] White, Lawrence H. Accounting for Fractional-Reserve Banknotes and Deposits—or, What’s Twenty Quid to the Bloody Midland Bank? (PDF). The Independent Review. Winter 2003, 7 (3): 423–41 [2016-07-02]. ISSN 1086-1653. （原始內容 (PDF)存檔於2015-04-29）.

[Allen_1993_703–717-9] Allen, William. Irving Fisher and the 100 Percent Reserve Proposal. Journal of Law and Economics. October 1993, 36 (2): 703–17. JSTOR 725805. doi:10.1086/467295.

[10] Texan Gold Depository. [2016-07-02]. （原始內容存檔於2017-10-26）.

[Diamond-Dybvig-11] Diamond, Douglas W; Philip H. Dybvig, Banking Theory, Deposit Insurance, and Bank Regulation, The Journal of Business, Jan 1986, 59 (1): 55–68, JSTOR 2352687, doi:10.1086/296314, In conclusion, 100% reserve banking is a dangerous proposal that would do substantial damage to the economy by reducing the overall amount of liquidity. Furthermore, the proposal is likely to be ineffective in increasing stability since it will be impossible to control the institutions that will enter in the vacuum left when banks can no longer create liquidity. Fortunately, the political realities make it unlikely that this radical and imprudent proposal will be adopted. |quote=和|postscript=只需其一 (幫助)

[12] Diamond, Douglas; Philip Dybvig. Bank Runs, Deposit Insurance, and Liquidity (PDF). Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review. Winter 2000, 24 (1): 14–23 [29 August 2012]. （原始內容存檔 (PDF)於2012-08-29）.

[13] Cochrane, John. Toward a run - free financial system (PDF). [2016-07-02]. （原始內容存檔 (PDF)於2014-04-29）.

[14] Krugman, Paul. Is A Banking Ban The Answer?. New York Times. April 26, 2014 [September 18, 2015]. （原始內容存檔於2019-12-08）.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]