用户:GR QM

Welcome to my user page! Feel free to leave any comment...

Userboxes

What I Speak

用户巴别信息 yue-N 呢位用户嘅母语系粤语。 en-4 This user has near native speaker knowledge of English. 查看用户语言

What I Am

这位用户来自亚洲。	该用户所在时区及时间为 UTC+8　11月14日17:20	这个用户是英属香港人。
British English这个用户说英式英语。	这个用户充满研究精神与好奇心。	此用户有某程度的抑郁症状。
${\hat {H}}\Psi =i\hbar {\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}\Psi$ 这个用户是一位高等物理爱好者。	${\begin{smallmatrix}\iiint _{\Omega }{\vec {\nabla }}\cdot {\vec {F}}\mathrm {d} v=\oiint _{\Sigma }{\vec {F}}\cdot \mathrm {d} {\vec {S}}\end{smallmatrix}}$ 这个用户是一位高等数学爱好者。	这个用户钻研数学物理。
这位用户是学生。	这个用户是香港大学的学生、校友或教职人员。	B.S.这个用户拥有理学学士学位。

What I Like

这个用户爱好物理学。	$\int _{2}^{x}{\frac {\mathrm {d} t}{\ln \,t}}$这个用户对数学 充满兴趣。	英文这个用户喜欢英文。English
这个用户爱好宇宙学。	这个用户是一名天文爱好者。	这个用户对地球科学感兴趣。
科普这个用户喜欢看科普书籍。	这个用户喜欢理查德·费曼。	这个用户喜欢史蒂芬·霍金。
这个用户研究或喜好历史	这个用户爱看电影。	这个用户是《哈利·波特》及其衍生作品爱好者。
这个用户关心时事或对新闻感兴趣。	这个用户是气象爱好者。	这个用户关注 中美关系。
该用户对大众运输感兴趣。	这位用户喜欢地铁。	这个用户喜欢旗帜
这位用户喜欢看地图。	R★CK 这个用户喜欢听 ☆摇滚乐☆	这位用户喜欢吃肯德基
PC-2此用户能以一般的方式使用电脑。	该用户使用Windows 7对中文维基百科作出贡献。	这个用户使用macOS对中文维基百科作出贡献。
该用户使用 对中文维基百科作出贡献。	这位用户使用YouTube。	这个用户使用iPhone对中文维基百科作出贡献。

What I Believe

这位用户支持香港独立	这位用户支持台湾独立	这个用户支持资本主义制度。
这个用户永远不会忘记香港警察对和平占中示威者的镇压	母语 教学这名用户反对母语教学。	粤教中这用户支持继续使用粤语教授中国语文科。
该用户自认是亲英主义（却身在外地）的大英帝国子民。	这个用户喜欢英国。 ‘I love the United Kingdom!’	这个用户喜欢美国。 “In God We Trust”
这个用户支持英国保守党。	这个用户支持美国共和党

Physics Books

Classical Mechanics

• Kleppner and Kolenkow (2013) [The 2nd edition of the classic on introductory Newtonian mechanics with SR.]
• Morin (2008) [Between the levels of Kleppner and Taylor. Best bit is the problems and solutions.]
• Taylor (2005) [A very well-written book at the UG level. Perfect for self-study.]
• Thornton and Marion (2003) [Many uni use this but isn't really good IMO.]
• Kibble and Berkshire (2004) [A typical British textbook.]
• Goldstein et al. (2001) [A definitive graduate book? Not one bit is comparable with Landau's...]
• Landau et al., Mechanics (1976) [This is the definitive one. Concise, elegant and rigorous.]
• Arnold et al. (1997) [Mechanics done by a mathematician.]

Electrodynamics

• Purcell and Morin (2013) [The 3rd edition of the classic Morin with a lot more problems and solutions. Includes only electro- and magnetostatics. Unique for its derivation of magnetism from relativity.]
• Feynman et al., The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol. 2 (2011) [Vol. 2 is the best of the Lectures.]
• Griffiths (2012) [Standard UG textbook. Well-written and excellent for self-study. Use it for the first 7 chapters and the one below for the rest...]
• Pollack and Stump (2001) [The 'dynamics' part is better than Griffiths.]
• Zangwill (2013) [A rather new EM book. Harder than Griffiths but easier than Jackson. Quite tedious IMO.]
• Jackson (1999) [The bible of EM! Difficult though...]
• Landau et al., The Classical Theory of Fields (1980) [EM and GR as a classical field theory.]
• Landau et al., Electrodynamics of Continuous Media (1984) [Tough!]

Thermal Physics and Condensed Matter Theory

• Schroeder (1999) [Well-written and good for self-study. Uses mostly a statistical viewpoint.]
• Reif (1967) [Classic.]
• Zemansky and Dittman (2011) [A thermodynamic view instead of a statistical one.]
• Pathria and Beale (2011) [A proper graduate-level text.]
• Landau et al., Statistical Physics, Part 1 (1980) [One of the best of the Course.]
• Lifshitz et al., Physical Kinetics (1981) [Mainly plasma, a major part of Landau's speciality.]
• Kittel (2004) [An UG-level book on solid state physics.]
• Ashcroft(1976) [Better than Kittel but harder and a bit dated.]
• Chaikin and Lubensky (2000) [Standard graduate-level text.]
• Altland and Simons (2010) [A well-written book at the graduate level.]
• Lifshitz et al., Statistical Physics, Part 2 (1980) [Despite the title, this really is a treatment on quantum condensed matter theory.]

Quantum Mechanics

• Feynman et al., The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol. 3 (2011) [A unique and rather conceptual introduction to QM.]
• Griffiths (2004) [With the same style as in his EM book this is useful for self-study. However he did specifically say the book is about "how to do QM" so there's no deep discussion on QM's physical meaning or mathematical structure. More of an introduction to wave mechanics.]
• Gasiorowicz (2003) [Broader than Griffiths but poorly written and not suitable for self-study IMO.]
• Miller (2008) [Not written for the physicist but the clear writing makes it an easy book to start with!]
• Park (2005) [A rather dated book republished by Dover in 2005.]
• Bransden and Joachain (2000) [Very comprehensive but not demanding! Underrated IMO.]
• Eisberg and Resnick (1985) [Verbose and lengthy. Not bad if you have the patience. Mainly about QM of atoms and molecules.]
• Liboff (2002) [Don't be fooled by the title. This is definitely written for graduates. Nothing special except the last chapter on quantum computing.]
• Zettili (2009) [A 'good' verison of Gasiorowicz.]
• Cohen-Tannoudji et al. (1992) [The 1500-page bible on QM. Well-written.]
• Ballentine (2014) [Uses a rather statistical view. This latest edition includes a brief on quantum computing.]
• Shankar (1994) [A rather light book at the graduate-level due to the clear writing and his style.]
• Sakurai (1993) [The first 3 or 4 chapters = must read!]
• Weinberg (2012) [The title tells this is gonna be a different thing from his other 'bibles'. He is surely a great quantum theorist but his personal style and the 'Lecture' nature of this makes it hard to read.]
• Dirac (1982) [The definitive classic book on QM.]
• Feynman and Hibbs (2010) [Mostly about path integrals which are always hard.]
• Landau et al., Quantum Mechanics: Non-relativistic Theory (1981) [You'll see why the Course was so highly regarded after reading the first chapter. A bit dated though and does not use Dirac notation. Mainly about solving the Schrödinger equation.]
• Lancaster and Blundell (2014) [You don't have to be gifted for this, really! The only undergraduate QFT book out there...]
• Ryder (1996) [Standard QFT book at the graduate level.]
• Schwartz (2013) [Well-written and up-to-date.]
• Zee (2010) [The only worth reading 'In a Nutshell' book IMO.]
• Peskin and Schroeder (1995) [Many uni use this but is certainly not an introduction! It feels nothing 'physics' to me.]
• Berestetski et al., Quantum Electrodynamics (1982) [Landau-style but unfortunately dated.]
• Feynman, Quantum Electrodynamics (1998) [Feynman himself was one of the creators of QED!]
• Weinberg (2005) [A 3-vol bible on QFT. Comprehensive but difficult. Unlike Peskin, it's got a genuine 'physics' taste.]

General Relativity

• Collier (2014) [Unique. Like a GR version of QFT for the Gifted Amateur.]
• Hartle (2003) [A well-written and accessible introduction to GR for undergraduates.]
• Cheng (2010) [Slightly harder than Hartle but still accessible. Well-written and suitable for self-study.]
• Schutz (2009) [Similar level as Cheng but the writing makes it hard for self-learners.]
• Misner, Thorne and Wheeler (1973) [A GR bible with more than 1200 pages. A good reference despite being dated.]
• Carroll (2003) [Graduate-level. Well-written but won't be too easy for an undergraduate.]
• Poisson and Will (2014) [A unique book whose title makes one feel it's yet another introductory book on GR. It largely deals with approximation methods which are useful for specialists.]
• Choquet-Bruhat (2015) [Not at all an introduction!]
• Dirac (1996) [Very concise. A display of GR's simplicity but not the right book to learn the material from.]
• Weinberg (1972) [Classic and one of the best on GR-Cosmology with emphasis on physics instead of simply mathematics.]
• Wald (1984) [Another classic. Difficult and mathematically rigorous despite the good writing.]

Beyond the Standard Model

• Zwiebach (2009) [The best and only readable book at the undergraduate level.]
• Becker et al. (2007) [Harder than Zwiebach but slightly more moderate compared with Polchinski.]
• Polchinski (2005) [Surely not an easy book...]
• Rovelli and Vidotto (2014) [The only UG-level LQG book. Well-written and quite friendly.]
• Rovelli (2007) [Read this after the above one if you want to learn LQG...]

Mathematical Physics

• Boas (2005) [Very well-written and suitable for self-study.]
• Riley et al. (2006) [More comprehensive and not as friendly as Boas but it's a good reference.]
• Arfken and Weber (2012) [Bad as a textbook but good as a reference when you already know the material.]
• Cahill (2013) [A pretty dense book for its attempt to include virtually ALL math needed in undergrad and graduate studies in less than 700 pages.]
• Szekeres (2004) [The best and most accessible (with calculus and linear algebra as the only prerequisites) book on mathematical physics (along with Hassani below).]
• Hassani (2013) [Same (or slightly higher) level as Szekeres but way more comprehensive as diff. eq., complex analysis are included.]